It is almost impossible to have not heard of BOTOX® in the last decade. Since its introduction to the public a little more than a decade ago, BOTOX® has become the most popular non-surgical cosmetic procedure performed to date. Dysport® has also emerged as a popular treatment to treat wrinkles in the same way as BOTOX®. If you have heard of both treatments, you may have also heard of the BOTOX® vs Dysport® debate. While both options are excellent treatments, one may work better for you than the other depending on your needs.
One reason why people are attracted to BOTOX® is because of its proven safety record. When used in the hands of a trained professional, it has less than one percent chance of negative side effects. For many years, BOTOX® stood alone as the king of anti-wrinkle nonsurgical procedures.
Recently, however, more and more people have been talking about the benefits of Dysport®. Dysport® is seen as an effective alternative treatment to BOTOX® when it comes to the battle against dynamic wrinkles. As it is with most cosmetic products, Dysport® was first used in Europe and in South America. The results were stellar. Years later, the FDA reviewed and approved Dysport® for distribution in the United States. Those who are considering Dysport® vs BOTOX® should know about the benefits of both.
While Dysport® has not achieved the name recognition of BOTOX®, it is quickly making a name for itself as something that is comparable to BOTOX® in many ways. Both Dysport® and BOTOX® use similar mechanisms when it comes to neuromuscular blocking. Dysport® and BOTOX® both show results in a similar time frame, somewhere between two and three days after the initial injection. Both last for approximately the same amount of time before their results start to disappear.
Something that does differentiate the two is the protein load. Dysport® has a lower protein level than BOTOX®. This means that if you get a Dysport® injection, your body will make fewer antibodies. The general belief was that Dysport® would produce results that last longer than BOTOX®. However, as we have previously mentioned, the results have shown that both of them last around the same amount of time.
Dysport® is formulated to spread more during the injection process than BOTOX®. Depending on what you’re treating, this can be very beneficial. For example, if you’re treating your forehead, which has a large space that needs to be treated, this is good. Someone who wants to focus on treating dynamic wrinkles in an area like this might benefit more from Dysport®.
Dysport® also comes in a more diluted form than BOTOX®. This can cause some confusion when it comes to pricing. Although one unit of Dysport® is a lot less expensive than one unit of BOTOX®, you will need more Dysport® to produce the same results you would get with less BOTOX®.
When it comes to answering the BOTOX® vs Dysport® question, it all comes down to your preferences. We are pleased to offer both treatments at Dermatology Consultants of South Florida, and we would be happy to help you decide on the best one for your needs. Contact us at either of our offices in Coral Springs or Sunrise today to learn more.
